Fly On Wall Street

Planning to Claim Social Security at 65? You May Need to Rethink That

For many people, the age of 65 is considered the standard retirement age for a few different reasons, including the fact that Medicare becomes available then. But if you’re planning on quitting work and claiming your Social Security benefits at 65, this is a decision you may end up regretting. Here’s why it could be a good idea to rethink your plans. 

Claiming Social Security at 65 will result in a benefits cut

One reason 65 is often thought of as the standard retirement age is that it used to be the full retirement age (FRA), or the age when you could claim your standard Social Security benefit. Of course, used to be, is the key phrase there. The age of 65 is no longer full retirement age and hasn’t been for a while. In fact, anyone who was born after 1942 has a later FRA — and everyone who hasn’t claimed their benefits yet was born beyond that year. 

If you were anticipating retiring at 65 and getting your standard Social Security benefit, you’ll probably be surprised to discover your full retirement age is actually later. Depending when you were born, it’s between 66 and 67 — and retiring anytime before that has consequences. 

In particular, there are three things that can happen if you claim Social Security at 65:

If you want to avoid reducing your standard benefit due to early filing penalties, you don’t want to doom yourself to smaller COLAs for life, and you want to be able to work as much as you’d like in retirement without any worries about your benefits being forfeited, you’re going to have to wait until full retirement age.

And that’s after 65 for every future retiree — so if you were anticipating filing for benefits at 65, you’re going to have to think again.

Exit mobile version